HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FC
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '21 at 14:02
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 83.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 250 85% 153 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 669 68% 548 Pts	64-Core 665 41% 665 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 85FC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 64 Parallax 7.5 5% 25.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB 20,171 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD70H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 252 256 254 258 258 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 1,093 Write 1,228 Mixed 757 SusWrite 284 188% 841 MB/s	4K Read 51.5 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 65.7 216% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 958 DQ Write 752 DQ Mixed 857 641% 856 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 235%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 537GB free Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 56 44 4.1 121 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 402 Write 258 Mixed 171 SusWrite 52.2 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 6.4 41% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 70 DQ Mixed 25.6 37% 71 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 23.6 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 23.7 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 35: 5R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
35%	44%	25	260	158	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE080D

History: Score 15: 3R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 35: 5R 2G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx Builds (Compare 5,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	3,203x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,365x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	614x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,607x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,504x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	497x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	424x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	414x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	278x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	717x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	431x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	399x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16