Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200723
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180 44,448 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 90.9 1-Core 148 2-Core 292 97% 177 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 1,010 92% 773 Pts	64-Core 1,617 100% 1,617 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.3% Good	Lighting 77 Reflection 85.8 Parallax 74.2 63% 79 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 92 Splatting 79.7 73% 90.8 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 664 538 539 546 543 541 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 1,650 Write 929 Mixed 929 SusWrite 562 226% 1,017 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 81 275% 97.1 MB/s	DQ Read 762 DQ Write 584 DQ Mixed 243 298% 530 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 277%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 28GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 39.9 Write 41.5 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 41.6 30% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.1% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 22.1 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 24.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	24"	1280 720	ACI24A5 VG248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	775x
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	240x
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	223x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	218x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	208x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	181x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	115x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	125x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	77x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 37,374 samples	63x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $573

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16