Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FA
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 12:51
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 184
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 257
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 16F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 58 7.1 40 66 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 361
Write 280
Mixed 225
SusWrite 69.5
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 7.1
30% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 43.5
48% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
897GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 138 139 139 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 127
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 136
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 18
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 20% 5 22 1 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO21ED
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback