Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 06:08
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 162
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 455
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 708
48% 708 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$330
Asus(1043 87F5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 118
Reflection 104
Parallax 110
95% 110 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 94.1
Splatting 81.9
80% 101 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 105%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$50
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 106 137 140 131 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 386
Write 366
Mixed 331
SusWrite 148
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 34.9
115% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.3% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 37.3
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 37.4
9% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 10
33% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 28.2
21% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$77
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.4% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 24
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 41: 5R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 14% 96 288 217 60 27" 1920 1080 SPT0CB3 C32
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 39,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $508
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback