Lenovo F0D3001HAU

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Lenovo F0D3001HAU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 36DA
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180706
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '21 at 03:23
Run Duration	304 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%
CPU Throttled	85%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 41.5 2-Core 76.6 36% 57.6 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 117 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 36DA) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	4.29% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 8.9 4% 6.6 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 5 4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.29% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 228 233 241 235 236 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Read 996 Write 835 Mixed 573 SusWrite 252 148% 664 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 35 114% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 195 144% 191 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 153 162 170 163 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 136 Write 174 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 160 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 114%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 61GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.8 3.5 3.4 4.4 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.44% Terrible	Read 3 Write 2 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 3.2 4% 2.97 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 1.44% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 2x8GB 6,014 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 35: 5R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
35%	30%	30	47	29	60	23.8"	1920 1080	LEN1206 LEN-24AST-B

History: Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 20: 2R 3G 1B | Score 35: 5R 3G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16