PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200617 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 31 '21 at 20:52 |
Run Duration | 282 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
192%
Outstanding
|
|||
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
|
5.7%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$113
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 290 418 415 409 364 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
142GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1005 804 704 262 262 258 MB/s
|
230%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
846GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 168 169 170 169 170 MB/s
|
99.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 175 181 186 190 199 MB/s
|
||||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
581GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 39 40 40 40 MB/s
|
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36% | 18% | 65 | 311 | 226 | 240 | 26.5" | 1920 1080 | GSM5B8E 27GN7 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 676x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 302x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 196x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 146x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 145x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 132x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $709 |