Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100223
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 18:32
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 28.7 2-Core 72.7 39% 57.8 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 275 34% 257 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 34E2) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.65% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 2.8 5% 3.93 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 3.5 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.65% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 342GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 411 387 370 394 420 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 566 Write 476 Mixed 490 SusWrite 402 109% 483 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 32.1 98% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 439 DQ Write 428 DQ Mixed 307 265% 391 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 340%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 678GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 80 94 88 103 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 20.2 Write 32.4 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 76.6 27% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.1 32% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 76%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.7 9.2 9.6 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 5.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 9.8 10% 8.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.9 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 96.9 41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 3R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	38%	8	11	1	60	31.5"	1920 1080	ACR0506 EB321HQ A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	397x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	251x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	375x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16