| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190603 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 31 '21 at 14:16 |
| Run Duration | 183 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
73.9%
Very good
|
69% 121 Pts
|
62% 516 Pts
|
54% 880 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
11% 13.6 fps
|
11% 13.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EB Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 241 231 239 240 240 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
189% 843 MB/s
|
108% 36.7 MB/s
|
279% 362 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 8.9 8.2 8.3 9.9 7.7 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
20% 16.9 MB/s
|
180% 3.1 MB/s
| |
|
|
93% 87.6 MB/s
|
72% 2.37 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.7%
Above average
|
56% 19.8 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
51% 78.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 19: 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19% | 12% | 41 | 102 | 57 | 60 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | SAM0D2C C24F390 |
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,561 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 707x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 278x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 263x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 614x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |