HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Laptop 15-da0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84A7
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181121
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 09:37
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	66% Good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 193 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 343 43% 328 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 84A7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9171 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 7.6 0% 6.17 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 8.4 6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB 8,741 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6104006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 101 73 74 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 308 Write 242 Mixed 279 SusWrite 87 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 81.9 4K Mixed 40.1 140% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 187 155% 226 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 90%
Seagate Basic 1TB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 221GB free Firmware: 9340 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 31 28 27 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 33.6 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 28.4 22% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB 38,499 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.3% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 11.3 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 57: 7R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
57%	32%	60	120	70	60	15.5"	1366 768	BOE06A5

History: Score 32: 3R 3G 8B | Score 57: 7R 5G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	1,514x
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples	980x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	673x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	2,164x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,684x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	297x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	130x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	121x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	101x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	636x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	374x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	359x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16