Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Predator PH315-52 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Covini_CFS
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 08:42
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 89.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 659 67% 543 Pts	64-Core 661 41% 661 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1343) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.68% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 96.4 Parallax 7.3 5% 36.6 fps	MRender 8.8 Gravity 6 Splatting 10.4 7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.68% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB 3,384 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: 202Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 409 416 423 424 419 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,593 Write 2,140 Mixed 1,307 SusWrite 437 308% 1,369 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 95.6 4K Mixed 63.8 202% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 859 DQ Write 718 DQ Mixed 803 598% 793 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 262%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 163GB free Firmware: ACM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 151 152 152 157 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 74.7 Write 130 Mixed 64 SusWrite 151 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 113% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 2x8GB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 18.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 24 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 7: 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
7%	8%	38	2	1	120	15.5"	1536 864	AUOD0ED

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 13: 1R 2G 2B | Score 7: 1R 0G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	3,343x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	553x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,794x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	1,498x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	603x

SSD
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GBNvmeBench 103%, 4,910 samples	358x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 159%, 3,211 samples	337x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 3,501 samples	302x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 17,072 samples	1,238x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	791x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	207x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16