Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 04:23
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 244
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 515
67% 505 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3734 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.3% Very good
Lighting 85.4
Reflection 107
Parallax 76
70% 89.6 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 84.7
Splatting 77.3
74% 93.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
786GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 325 317 330 359 410 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 355
Write 331
Mixed 303
SusWrite 336
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 20.5
73% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 89.8
110% 188 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 102%
Team T2535T120G 120GB
35GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 61 38 55 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 433
Write 372
Mixed 365
SusWrite 65.4
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 27
117% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 48
93% 183 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
817GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 145 137 153 148 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 135
Write 134
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 145
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
52GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 22 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 0.5
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 22.7
24% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.7
188% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 16GB
1700, 1700 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $218
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback