Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade Stealth (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 03:30
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 183 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 304 41% 304 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 6752) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.05% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 7.5 6% 6.53 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 10.7 7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.05% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 898GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 969 1194 1215 1071 1103 1083 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 1,233 Write 1,330 Mixed 788 SusWrite 1,106 251% 1,114 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 27.2 163% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 678 DQ Write 863 DQ Mixed 267 342% 602 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E6E304EE-EGCF 2x4GB 953 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66.7% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 22 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 20.8 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	3%	33	23	3	60	12.5"	1707 960	SHP142F LQ125T1JW02

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	328x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	162x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	106x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	199x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	157x
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	90x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	84x
CA3-8D256 256GBLiteonBench 148%, 3,184 samples	49x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	48x

RAM
K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 14,699 samples	382x
MT52L1G32D4PG-107 2x8GBSamsungBench 58%, 468 samples	65x
K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 5,177 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16