| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120907 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 31 '21 at 01:19 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.3%
Above average
|
59% 98.3 Pts
|
19% 141 Pts
|
9% 144 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
XFX(1682 233A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 335.23
|
0.44%
Terrible
|
0% 0.8 fps
|
1% 0.87 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 61 33 25 50 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
60% 82.1 MB/s
|
151% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
7GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9 9 9.6 9 9.6 MB/s
|
9.58%
Terrible
|
20% 17.2 MB/s
|
45% 1.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown AM2U139C2P1-B00S Transcend JM1333KLN-2G 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
41.1%
Average
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
36% 12.4 GB/s
|
48% 83.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,035 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 158x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 100x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 78x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 116x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $155 |