Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170401
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 00:06
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 83.3 2-Core 144 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 356 38% 305 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 6755) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	5.15% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 6.5 5% 5.2 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 8.8 6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.15% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 557 266 258 254 249 241 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,389 Write 1,133 Mixed 673 SusWrite 304 194% 875 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 58.9 193% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 683 DQ Write 563 DQ Mixed 652 480% 633 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 259%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GB 2,214 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 22.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 21.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 19: 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	6%	79	31	20	60	13.9"	1920 1080	AUO133D

History: Score 17: 3R 0G 2B | Score 19: 3R 1G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,058x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,443x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,752x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16