Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U 15,631 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 61.2 2-Core 124 50% 84.4 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 198 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 57%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 900GB free (System drive) Firmware: RSM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 56 57 44 29 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 77.9 Write 29.6 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 42.7 33% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB 18,494 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 13.2 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	5	4	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	296x
Ryzen 3 2200UAMDBench 45%, 15,631 samples	286x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 28%, 7,071 samples	171x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	291x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	285x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	171x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	44x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	43x
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	37x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	176x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	88x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	69x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16