Compal QAL51

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compal QAL51 (all builds)
Motherboard	Compal Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '21 at 15:36
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 441 42% 349 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M 3,728 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Compal(14C0 0066) 1GB CLim: 624 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 7.6 4% 6.63 fps	MRender 7.3 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 6.2 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 111 113 111 111 109 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 337 Write 115 Mixed 166 SusWrite 112 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 25.4 88% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 108 87% 123 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 73%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 54GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 38 29 29 31 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 143 Write 30.9 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 35.3 76% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.4 174% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/4G KHX1600C9S3L/8G 12GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.6% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 10.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11.7 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	BOE05BC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QAL51 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Compal QAL51

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	13x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	8x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	15x
GeForce GT 640MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,728 samples	12x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 165 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,121 samples	3x
99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 51%, 4,502 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16