Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY320
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	12 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '21 at 11:33
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 62.9 1-Core 138 2-Core 224 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 401 47% 362 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1A58 1001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	9.85% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 13.2 9% 12 fps	MRender 14.3 Gravity 13.7 Splatting 14.3 12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.85% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB 3,184 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: C480903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 204 206 209 227 235 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 1,179 Write 780 Mixed 586 SusWrite 222 153% 692 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 28.2 108% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 700 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 433 336% 473 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 45.7 MC Mixed 40 123% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 27.7 77% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	13.3"	1280 701	SHP14B8

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	264x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	142x
GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 36%, 6,904 samples	90x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	67x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	53x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	33x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	256x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16