Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G9-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2_SKS
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 11:16
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 187
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 497
53% 420 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.1% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 112
Parallax 86.1
62% 91.7 fps
MRender 89.7
Gravity 84.6
Splatting 93.1
73% 89.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 537 551 561 554 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 914
Write 620
Mixed 469
SusWrite 488
139% 623 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 19.2
74% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 52.9
DQ Mixed 224
196% 309 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 104%
Great: 445%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
651GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 94 97 96 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 62.1
Write 61.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 93.5
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 07B8 1TB
637GB free, PID 07b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 91 87 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 79.8
Write 60.3
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 83.4
92% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 45%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 59 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 90.3
Write 82.9
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 58.8
95% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 54.6" 1280 720 SAM0D4F SAMSUNG
Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback