Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5800-$58 8,890 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 33.2 32% 43.9 Pts	4-Core 30.4 8-Core 85.4 6% 57.9 Pts	64-Core 26.4 2% 26.4 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 193 97 63 65 46 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.7% Below average	Read 224 Write 209 Mixed 201 SusWrite 111 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 13.3 69% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 85.7 DQ Mixed 17.7 24% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 81%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 11GB free Firmware: ZH100-47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 42 40 38 41 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 41.2 Write 50.1 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 40.5 30% 41.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	13x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	10x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	8x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	8x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $79

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16