HP EliteBook 8760w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8760w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1630
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 128
56% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 321
33% 265 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 392.65
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
7.94% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 11.4
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.94%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 126 158 157 162 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 243
Write 235
Mixed 221
SusWrite 150
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 19.3
66% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 145
125% 184 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 93%
Plextor PX-256M8VC 256GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 245
Write 232
Mixed 230
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 27.2
91% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 118
113% 176 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 115%
SAMSUNG HD163GJ 160GB
149GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 114 115 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
Read 44.1
Write 116
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 114
122% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.57 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17.3" 1280 720 CMN1732
Typical EliteBook 8760w Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8760w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $276
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback