PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 176C |
Memory | 28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150407 |
Uptime | 8.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 30 '21 at 10:01 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3920XM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.72
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 201 196 191 194 192 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
747GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | ACI22E5 VX229 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples | 99x |
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 92x |
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples | 82x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples | 296x |
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples | 95x |
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $100 |