Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 22:00
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 160
2-Core 314
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 834
88% 704 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 178
Parallax 198
146% 185 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 157
Splatting 132
128% 160 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 1120 1220 1075 1028 1082 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 1,127
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 1,057
252% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 83.7
275% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 719
DQ Mixed 811
607% 811 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 236%
Great: 372%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
35GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 100 104 99 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 93.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 97.8
55% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HUH721212ALN600 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: LEGNT3D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 239 246 245 244 242 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 237
Mixed 110
SusWrite 241
151% 206 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.3
309% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 130 128 125 121 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 130
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 126
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
237% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 99%
General USB Flash Disk 125GB
22GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 5.7 9.3 0.7 14 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 173
Write 28.7
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 8.7
65% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.8
255% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.5
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 48" 1280 720 SNY4C03 SONY TV
Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $685
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback