Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 16:18
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 556
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3670) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1675 MHz, MLim: 1977 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 72.3
62% 76.1 fps
MRender 77.7
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 63.1
58% 71.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3618
Write 3,263
Mixed 3,226
752% 3369 MB/s
4K Read 211
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 60.1
444% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 425
301% 378 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$88
466GB free
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 403 397 398 397 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 674
Write 423
Mixed 513
SusWrite 399
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 45.5
147% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 455
339% 451 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 117%
Great: 442%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 61 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 228
Write 71.2
Mixed 107
SusWrite 68.4
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 12.8
68% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 14.7
20% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 53%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
92GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 191 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Above average
Read 246
Write 192
Mixed 212
SusWrite 192
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 26.1
85% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 36.7
29% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 50%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
154GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 152 152 152 152 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46% Average
Read 202
Write 216
Mixed 192
SusWrite 152
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 25.9
84% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 34.8
32% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 46%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0E3C U32H85x
Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback