Jp.ik TURN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJp.ik TURN  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Mobile PC
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime31.8 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 12:58
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 47.7
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 71.6
33% 53.2 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 174
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Elitegroup(1019 9854) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.17 fps
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.35 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFN025SA328-6000000 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 332 327 333 328 336 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.6% Good
Read 379
Write 324
Mixed 304
SusWrite 328
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 12.7
70% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 35
86% 176 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KT4GS4NE8 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 11.6" 1280 720 IVO048C
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback