IBM 00D2887

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardIBM 00D2887  (all builds)
Memory61.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 05:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 98.5
42% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 376
32% 277 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 61%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 599GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 50 57 52 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.6% Excellent
Read 252
Write 56
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 54
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 158%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.2% Very good
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 29.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 00D2887 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: IBM 00D2887

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback