Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 11:56
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 178
2-Core 292
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 785
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 114
Parallax 31.9
24% 58.6 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 21.9
23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1438 1523 1356 379 390 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,722
Write 1,506
Mixed 1493
SusWrite 913
316% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 80.6
278% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,177
DQ Mixed 1,144
893% 1,232 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 267%
Great: 253%
USB Flash Memory 16GB
10GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.1 4.7 4.4 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Read 35.1
Write 2.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.5
11% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 22.1
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 19.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback