Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

Performance Results

Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 28%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 11:56
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 184
2-Core 317
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 792
85% 661 Pts
64-Core 791
53% 791 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 114
Parallax 31.9
24% 58.6 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 21.9
30% 29.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1438 1523 1356 379 390 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,722
Write 1,506
Mixed 1493
SusWrite 913
316% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 80.6
278% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,177
DQ Mixed 1,144
893% 1,232 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 267%
Great: 259%
USB Flash Memory 16GB
10GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.1 4.7 4.4 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Read 35.1
Write 2.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.5
11% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 22.1
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 19.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 22%
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 20%

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback