Acer Predator PH317-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienna_CFS
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 10:14
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 170
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 382
43% 339 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1267) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 58
48% 61.8 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 55.6
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 278 296 146 149 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 403
Write 391
Mixed 326
SusWrite 209
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 20.8
83% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 128
114% 173 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 91%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
379GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 93 97 101 100 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65% Good
Read 130
Write 120
Mixed 73
SusWrite 96
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.2
143% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 4.9
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 6R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 33% 61 198 102 144 17.2" 1920 1080 AUO329D
History: Score 22: 2R 2G 6B | Score 50: 6R 3G 11B
Typical Predator PH317-52 Builds (Compare 1,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback