Gigabyte Z590 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive432% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z590 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 02:10
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 190
2-Core 381
118% 222 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,199
115% 947 Pts
64-Core 1,789
111% 1,789 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$88
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2983 3070 3044 1116 767 772 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
432% Outstanding
Read 2988
Write 3,095
Mixed 2,695
SusWrite 1,958
604% 2,684 MB/s
4K Read 86.2
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 121
403% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,649
DQ Write 1,374
DQ Mixed 1,474
1,114% 1,499 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 432%
Great: 442%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
226GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 411 411 412 412 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,034
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,288
SusWrite 591
339% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 93.6
323% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 1,522
DQ Mixed 1,150
901% 1,223 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 273%
Great: 302%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 235 237 236 233 236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 224
Mixed 103
SusWrite 235
143% 195 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.8
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 131%
Great: 138%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 181 181 180 178 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 243
Mixed 108
SusWrite 180
141% 192 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.6
335% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 120%
Great: 138%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
742GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 171 165 170 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 218
Mixed 100
SusWrite 168
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 2
382% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 109%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZKW 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 31.5
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 36.2
106% 37 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 75" 1280 701 ONK1260 AV Receiver
Typical GA-Z590 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 3,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z590 AORUS MASTER - $362

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,619
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback