HP 750-567c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 750-567c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 27 '21 at 22:29
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 223
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 661
65% 531 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 66
58% 69.8 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 64.3
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 249 249 244 237 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 401
Write 264
Mixed 244
SusWrite 247
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 33.9
110% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 114
141% 252 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 171 169 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 122
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 167
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
3.5TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 174 177 175 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 170
Write 164
Mixed 59
SusWrite 173
187% 141 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
157% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 81%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
127GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 35.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 30.4
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
Generic Mass-Storage 64GB
18GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.8 8.5 8.3 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 14.6
Write 14
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 8.5
17% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3
200% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD
Typical 750-567c Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-567c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $247
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback