Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 27 '21 at 20:19
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$172
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 186
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 482
53% 408 Pts
64-Core 550
37% 550 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.1% Below average
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 22.9
15% 35.4 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 15.2
52% 48.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 56%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 7
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.4
5% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$142
568GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 367 376 369 375 357 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 394
Write 365
Mixed 347
SusWrite 367
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 31.2
109% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 138%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
580GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 48 36 32 46 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 156
Write 147
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 39.5
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 50: 7R 1G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 26% 76 64 44 144 23.8" 1920 1080 AUS2421 ASUS VG249
History: Score 24: 0R 8G 0B | Score 50: 7R 1G 12B
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback