PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7A74 |
Motherboard | MSI B250M PRO-VD (MS-7A74) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170406 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 27 '21 at 16:08 |
Run Duration | 243 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 54 57 30 45 24 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
137GB free
Firmware: UG4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 165 53 71 54 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
28GB free
Firmware: 40.00A40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 69 70 70 71 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
67% | 37% | 57 | 208 | 50 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | SAM0D32 C27F390 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 641x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 413x |
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 214x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 554x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 273x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 200x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $198 |