Asus M4A88TD-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A88TD-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '21 at 15:14
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 214 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 38.3 2-Core 76.6 42% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 147 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3722) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Average	Lighting 60.3 Reflection 60.6 Parallax 60.1 49% 60.3 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 64.7 Splatting 60 52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: JKAOA20N SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 21 26 39 33 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 52.6 Write 33.7 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 31.9 29% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 70%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 144GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 32 37 35 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 54.6 Write 25.1 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 32.3 28% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.7 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	5%	96	320	248	60	24"	1920 1080	ACR03E3 K242HL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A88TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-M EVO

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	11x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	9x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	4x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
Force LX 128GBCorsair $144Bench 71%, 1,867 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	12x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $245

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16