Monster TULPAR T5 V19.2

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V19.2 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V19.2
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200418
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 22:53
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 136 2-Core 252 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 653 67% 539 Pts	64-Core 810 50% 810 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1097) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.84% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 97 Parallax 8.4 5% 37.2 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 11.1 8% 8.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.84% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB 9,396 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 538GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1380 1353 1272 1194 1196 1171 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 2,353 Write 2,249 Mixed 1,300 SusWrite 1,261 401% 1,791 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 75.6 247% 83.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,022 DQ Write 803 DQ Mixed 926 689% 917 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GB 13,312 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.4% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 15 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	144	15.5"	1280 720	LGD0625

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V19.2 Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V19.2

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	272x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	151x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	121x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 7,447 samples	75x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	46x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	13x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	122x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 1,244 samples	32x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 49%, 13,312 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16