Asrock FM2A55M-VG3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A55M-VG3 (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 740K 4,318 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 64.2 2-Core 89.2 48% 74.6 Pts	4-Core 80.1 8-Core 83.5 11% 81.8 Pts	64-Core 83.5 5% 83.5 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 318F) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 9.1 Parallax 5.2 3% 6.17 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 5.8 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 897GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 139 150 145 151 166 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 150 Write 164 Mixed 83 SusWrite 143 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 139GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 95 122 128 129 128 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 140 Write 121 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 121 73% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 8GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.6 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 8: 0R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	10%	63	24	12	60	21.5"	1920 1080	AOC2269 2269W

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 8: 0R 1G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A55M-VG3 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-VG3

CPU
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	4x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)AMD $59Bench 51%, 6,408 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
R9 270AMD $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
120GB 120GBKingmaxBench 64%, 2,908 samples	2x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	2x

RAM
Team-Elite-1333 8GBUnknownBench 41%, 148 samples	2x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 4GBHynixBench 40%, 67 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16