Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 14:02
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 216
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 525
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD256 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2020
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,577
Write 966
Mixed 954
257% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 27
181% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 461
438% 678 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 224%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 10R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 43% 30 150 85 60 0" 2560 1440
History: Score 31: 2R 4G 9B | Score 15: 2R 1G 2B | Score 42: 6R 3G 3B | Score 58: 10R 2G 2B | Score 59: 10R 3G 0B
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback