PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Default string |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5 (all builds) |
Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170608 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 26 '21 at 12:08 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 239 241 218 241 243 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
854GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 86 84 84 85 MB/s
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 50 | 27" | 1280 720 | SAM0D32 C27F390 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 100x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 39x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 19x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 16x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $753 |