Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55D-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 11:33
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 85.6
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 145
60% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 267
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 49.2
46% 54 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 45.7
38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 211 212 211 222 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.3% Good
Read 237
Write 227
Mixed 216
SusWrite 204
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 27.3
100% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 196
146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
641GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 94 97 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 93.9
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 13
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7955 BenQ EW2780Q
Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $518
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback