Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics67.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 10:07
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 280
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 714
77% 610 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.3% Good
Lighting 83.6
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 78.9
68% 84.7 fps
MRender 93.2
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 72.6
66% 81.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 471 425 422 425 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,598
Write 1,867
Mixed 1212
SusWrite 432
286% 1,277 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 72.9
242% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 923
673% 881 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 204%
Great: 262%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
432GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 952 613 611 611 612 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,407
Write 1,682
Mixed 668
SusWrite 852
259% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 56.4
195% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 843
687% 976 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 215%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 24.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 25.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 120 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0FA Dell AW3418DW
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback