Asus H110M-A D3

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A D3 (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150924
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 08:58
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 175 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 376 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8520) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.1% Below average	Lighting 42.5 Reflection 45.3 Parallax 41.2 35% 43 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 34.6 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 201 195 182 202 194 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 394 Mixed 349 SusWrite 210 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 50 167% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 324 246% 332 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 147GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 149 147 150 151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 65.5 Write 91.5 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 149 61% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2.3 406% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GB 12,132 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	29.6% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	24"	1280 720	SAM0B43 S24D300

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A D3 Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A D3

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	39x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	27x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	15x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x
S700 250GBHP $46Bench 66%, 9,815 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	10x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBPatriotBench 54%, 50 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16