Asus M2N-SLI

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	15% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M2N-SLI (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 08:21
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9150e 947 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 41.3 1-Core 21 2-Core 46.5 24% 36.3 Pts	4-Core 41.7 8-Core 59.4 6% 50.6 Pts	64-Core 61.1 4% 61.1 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.87% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 19.7 0% 12.7 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 21.4 Splatting 16.8 17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 5.87% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB 3,189 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.75.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15% Very poor	Read 49.5 Write 29.2 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 32 10% 43.3 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 9.1 33% 9.67 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 21.5 DQ Mixed 13.1 11% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 96%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 70GB free Firmware: CR100-13 SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 57.7 Write 65.3 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 51.6 40% 54.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 44%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 500GB 634 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 139GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 26.4 Write 29.2 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 33.6 22% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 5.4 14% 5.03 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 39: 4R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
39%	18%	73	68	5	60	28.8"	2560 1080	ACR0502 Acer XF290C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M2N-SLI Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-SLI

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	3x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 4,607 samples	2x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	7x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	3x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $139

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16