Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 03:02
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 69 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 178 63% 111 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 511 49% 405 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 91.5 Parallax 23.7 15% 44.4 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 20.3 Splatting 13.9 12% 15.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB 7,536 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 161 168 155 154 146 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 617 Write 606 Mixed 589 SusWrite 179 112% 498 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 33.9 124% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 574 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 258 230% 356 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 131%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 327GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 146 144 147 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 78.9 Write 104 Mixed 61 SusWrite 146 72% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 16GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3200, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 26.8 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 21.5 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 47: 4R 7G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
47%	47%	36	262	200	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP002D

History: Score 30: 3R 2G 9B | Score 47: 4R 7G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	493x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	301x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16