Malibal Satori

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMalibal Satori  (all builds)
MotherboardMalibal Satori
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140327
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 01:10
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 162
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 456
43% 356 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
Clevo(1558 5281) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 31.6
21% 29.4 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 27.1
25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 mSATA 240GB-$120
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 82 84 73 68 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 149
Write 107
Mixed 117
SusWrite 76.6
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 17.8
58% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 96
90% 147 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 86%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
736GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 123 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 77.7
Write 75.1
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 123
53% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 17% 47 236 150 60 15.5" 1920 1080 LEN40B2
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback