Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HC
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 23:30
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Memory 37.3
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 40.5
23% 35.2 Pts
4-Core 72.3
8-Core 58.8
9% 65.6 Pts
64-Core 70
4% 70 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
831GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 93 102 97 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 47.7
Write 89.6
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 93.8
46% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 3 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback