Toshiba SATELLITE Radius 15 P50W-C-110

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE Radius 15 P50W-C-110 (all builds)
Motherboard	FF40 0693
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151007
Uptime	34.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 19:42
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 76.5 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 159 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 239 32% 237 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 F822) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.18% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 6.6 5% 5.67 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 9.3 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.18% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,145 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 213 277 257 235 226 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 443 Write 292 Mixed 235 SusWrite 246 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 32.4 124% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 244 206% 303 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 34,976 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 19.3 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 19.1 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE Radius 15 P50W-C-110

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)