Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition (all builds)
Memory	52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210122
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 17:29
Run Duration	392 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Memory 78.2 1-Core 167 2-Core 322 100% 189 Pts	4-Core 642 8-Core 1,243 112% 943 Pts	64-Core 2,257 140% 2,257 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3732) CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 126 Parallax 145 122% 140 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 144 Splatting 116 118% 149 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS200T1X0E-00AF 2TB 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 6130 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3971 4096 4102 4134 4142 4138 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Corsair MP600 PR 1TB 545GB free Firmware: EIFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 4235 4287 1237 969 899 1124 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate ST10000NE0004-1ZF101 10TB 308 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 1.5TB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 215 210 211 209 215 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 165 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 211 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.1 347% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 131%
Seagate ST12000NM0007-2A1101 12TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4TB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 206 199 202 202 205 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 135%
Seagate ST12000NM0007-2A1101 12TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2TB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 136 137 136 139 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$139 396 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 174 170 171 169 173 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$221 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 3TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 183 186 186 185 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 77.2 Write 80.1 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 185 73% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 198% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 133%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB 825 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 18 38 38 38 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 33.2 Write 35.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 34.4 24% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 0.6 248% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 89%
WD My Book 25EE 14TB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 159 158 155 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 159 Write 166 Mixed 188 SusWrite 160 233% 168 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 1.4 386% 6.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 10.1 DQ Mixed 2 415% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 103%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 166 164 165 166 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 148 Write 156 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 163 185% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.3 120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB 12,538 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.4% Excellent	MC Read 46.9 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 27.3 96% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 27.5 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 139%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	60	27"	1280 720	AUS27A7 BE27A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Razer Edition Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 191%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 210%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	73x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	66x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	65x

GPU
RX 6900-XTAMD $1,000Bench 195%, 16,057 samples	34x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	33x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	28x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	31x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GBCorsairBench 108%, 1,159 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,353

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16