Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 17:08
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	KWT-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 67.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 222 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 564 52% 432 Pts	64-Core 566 35% 566 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 87.3 Parallax 20.9 12% 41.1 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 13.7 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 381 384 390 418 420 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 761 Write 668 Mixed 615 SusWrite 397 137% 610 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 45.8 126% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 672 DQ Write 618 DQ Mixed 438 385% 576 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 129 122 136 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 79.5 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 128 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.3 126% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB 21,753 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.7% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.9 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	120	15.5"	1536 801	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	492x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	300x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16