HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8257
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 14:54
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 168
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 414
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M
HP(103C 8257) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1282 MHz, MLim: 1560 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 38.4
27% 37.4 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 30.3
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,444
Write 1,038
Mixed 644
230% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 47.1
155% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 495
366% 480 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
177GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 79 81 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 90
Write 86.9
Mixed 31
SusWrite 79.1
52% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 75%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB
464GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 66 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 70.8
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 67.6
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 4R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 20% 49 58 41 60 0" 1920 1080 ASUS VX279
History: Score 20: 1R 3G 6B | Score 34: 3R 4G 7B | Score 38: 4R 6G 0B
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback