Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 13:41
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 29.8
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 100
36% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 133
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 95
6% 95 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$390
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.6% Below average
Lighting 69
Reflection 118
Parallax 49.5
56% 79 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 23
Splatting 31.4
18% 25.4 fps
Poor: 81%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 95%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 458 512 514 485 453 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,500
Write 1,343
Mixed 1,111
SusWrite 487
248% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 32.9
110% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 495
380% 522 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 148%
Great: 333%
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
113GB free
Firmware: CS303225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 439 247 264 256 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 864
Write 876
Mixed 825
SusWrite 322
162% 722 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 36.3
118% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 657
476% 622 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 118%
Great: 214%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
137GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 328 373 377 372 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 385
Write 365
Mixed 354
SusWrite 368
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 27.8
94% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 178 202 217 209 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 132
Write 182
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 187
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K Golden Empire CL16-18-18 D4-3200 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K Golden Empire CL16-18-18 D4-3200 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 256
16% 256 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 12: 1R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 11% 36 91 5 165 31.5" 2560 1440 GBT3200 G32QC
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 93,264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,080
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback