| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160125 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 25 '21 at 12:14 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.3%
Above average
|
67% 112 Pts
|
28% 214 Pts
|
16% 265 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26%
Poor
|
27% 34.1 fps
|
24% 30.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 50 28 50 55 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
21% 28.5 MB/s
|
38% 0.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63.9%
Good
|
65% 22.9 GB/s
|
52% 18.3 GB/s
|
48% 83.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 5 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | PHLC17C PHL 246E9Q |
Typical H110M-DGS Builds (Compare 841 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 140x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 103x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 90x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 73x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 64x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $154 |