HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 836B
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190508
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 12:11
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 166 63% 109 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 372 40% 319 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 836B) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6230 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 30 Parallax 21.9 0% 17.4 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 19.5 19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 6.47% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB 36,473 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 289GB free Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1224 1106 580 444 446 444 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 839 Write 1,202 Mixed 929 SusWrite 707 208% 919 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 54.2 184% 68.3 MB/s	DQ Read 733 DQ Write 692 DQ Mixed 797 575% 741 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 262%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 699GB free (System drive) Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 57 45 45 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 100 Write 69 Mixed 28 SusWrite 52.3 46% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	38.4% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 12.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 93.5 43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15D3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,678x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	771x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,404x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	982x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	48x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	212x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	102x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	91x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	240x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	210x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	148x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16